Adolf Hitler did everything he could to avoid war; Winston Churchill did everything he could to ensure it.
Once a man understands these facts, he cannot remain a Christian and praise Churchill.


Adolf Hitler did everything he could to avoid war; Winston Churchill did everything he could to ensure it.
Once a man understands these facts, he cannot remain a Christian and praise Churchill.


Not everything that is not morally impermissible in se (i.e., not per se sin) should be societally or legally permissible.
Men have a duty not to take advantage of women who make themselves sexually available; fathers have a duty to ensure their daughters are not sexually available.
Despite their — loud and irksome — virtue signalling, I know for a fact that the enemies and adversaries seldom — if ever — actually speak with those of mixed race on matters of actual import; I, on the other hand, have fielded many questions from those of mixed race. Naturally, I never reveal anything said to me in confidence, and I consider anything said in private to have been said in confidence — meine Ehre heißt Treue, usw. —, but I can certainly state that I have not infrequently fielded questions from those of mixed race about marriage, children, and related matters. Instead of continuing to address these singly, and so that my position will be both public and clear, I will give my general advice here.
First, those of mixed race have — undoubtedly — been burdened by the indiscretion of their parents, grandparents, vel al., and this cannot be ignored. It is a disservice to all — both those without mixed lineages and those with them — to pretend that being of mixed race is not a burden. In fact, those of mixed race (at least these days) often recognize this reality much more clearly than those not of mixed race (much as someone with a disability often understands the reality of it better than those who do not suffer from such disability).
Second, this burden plays out with regard to spouse selection. If I were to marry, I would not have any of the considerations that are particular to those of mixed race — I would simply choose a Germanic woman and that would be that. Those of mixed race have competing loyalties, for they come from multiple, distinct lines. As a general rule, I would recommend that a man of mixed race ‘choose’ the race of his father and consider those his people, and take a wife from that stock. This is, however, a general rule, not a universal one — this is a matter of wisdom.
Third, this burden plays out with regard to children — generally. The children of mixed marriages or lines will, like their mixed parent or parents, carry the burden of having multiple lines and competing loyalties; again, I recommend selecting the patrilineal line and instilling in one’s children a sense of pride in and loyalty to that line — this is more difficult for those of mixed race, for obvious reasons.
Fourth, this burden plays out with regard to children — genetically. Humans do not benefit from ‘hybrid vigor’ (which sometimes plays out in animals, plants, et cetera), and so there are very real genetic and other concerns for those of mixed race when it comes to having children. Those of mixed race are often burdened with genetic defects (or other ‘costs’), and many of those are heritable. For those with serious genetic defects, I would strongly suggest considering not having children, because I consider it morally impermissible to burden children in that fashion. For those without such serious genetic defects, I would emphasize that children are a blessing from the Lord, even when they come with difficulties.
Fifth, some general moral, ethical, religious, et cetera, considerations.
Much more could, of course, be said on this topic, but I believe these points form the core of what needs to be said. This has long been and remains my advice for those of mixed race. I am neither going to sugarcoat the matter nor resort to hyperbole — being of mixed race is not the end of the world, but it is also very clearly not ideal. Some pairings are far less wise and far more troublesome than others, but all come with their burdens. This life is neither ‘fair’ nor equal, and every man must bear his burdens, even if, in some cases, those burdens are heavier than those borne by others.
Opposition to student loan ‘forgiveness’ among the Boomers is the perfect encapsulation of the abiding, solipsistic malice they harbor for all others.
A man who is looking to get married wants a debt-free virgin who is in her twenties and has no tattoos.
The degree to which a man is willing to compromise on those requirements is generally also the degree to which what he is seeking is not marriage.
Do Jews poison wells? Of course not, now they get you pay for poison by putting it in your feed, your ‘medicines’, and your water supply.
Literally no one (except Mormons, historically) is arguing that blacks are cursed with dark skin. As Woe and I have both pointed out repeatedly: Skin tone is part of God’s design, accounting for living on different parts of the globe. The curse on blacks is not their skin color.
I have not once seen the enemy or adversary pastors condemn the treatment (read: torture) of Southern prisoners during or after the Civil War or of German prisoners during or after World War II.
Yes, I am obviously fully aware of the fact that many will misinterpret this (no, that is not necessarily my goal, but it is certainly something I am willing to permit). No, I am not going to (fully) explain it here and now.
I will, however, give this reminder: per quod is not per se.